More ISO Settings Misinformation
This WAS going to be a post about exposure…….!
But, this morning I was on the Facebook page of friend where I came across a link he’d shared to this page which makes a feature of this:
This style of schematic for the Exposure Triangle is years old and so is nothing new.
When using FILM the ISO value IS a measure of sensitivity to light – that of the film, in other words its SPEED. Higher ISO film is more sensitive to light than lower ISO film, and the increased sensitivity brings about larger ‘grain’ in the image.
When we talk ‘digital photography’ however the ISO value HAS NOTHING TO WITH SENSITIVITY TO LIGHT – of anything inside your camera, including the damn sensor.
ISO in digital cameras is APPLIED GAIN. Applied ‘after the exposure has been made’..after the fact…after Elvis has left the freaking building!
Your sensors sensitivity to light is FIXED and dictated by the size of the photosites that make up the sensor – that is, the sensor pixel pitch.
People who persist in leading you guys into thinking that ISO controls sensor sensitivity should be shot, or better still strapped over the muzzle of an artillery piece……..
The article then goes on to advise the following pile of horse crap:
Recommended ISO settings:
- ISO 100 or 200 for sunny and bright daylight
- ISO 400 ISO for cloudy days, or indoors
- ISO 800 for indoors (without a flash)
- ISO 1600+ for very low light situations
WTF??? What year are we in – 2007??
And this pile of new 2017 junk is on a website dedicated to a certain camera manufacturer who’s cameras have produced superb images at ISO settings way higher than the parameters stated above for ages.
Take this shot from a Canon 1DX Mk1 – old tech/off-sensor ADCs etc:
ISO settings are at the bottom of the pile when it comes to good action photography – the overriding importance at all times is SHUTTER SPEED and AF performance.
I don’t care about ‘ISO noise’ anywhere near as much as I care about focus and freezing the action, and neither should you guys.
What have the above and below shots got in common – apart from the wildlife category?
1/8000th shutter speed and an aperture of 7.1 – aperture for DoF and shutter speed to freeze the action – stuff the ‘noise’.
And speaking of ‘noise’ – there isn’t anywhere near enough to screw the shot up for stock sale even at full size, and I’ll tell you again, noise hardly prints at all!
Here’s another ‘old tech’ Canon 1DX Mk1 shot:
Don’t get me wrong, when I want maximum Dynamic Range I shoot at base ISO, but generally you’ll never find me shooting at any fixed ISO other than base; other than when shooting astro landscapes. Everything else is Auto ISO.
So a fan website, in 2017, is basically telling you not to use the ISO speeds that I use all the damn time – and they are justifying that with bad information.
Please people, 90% plus of what you see on the web is total garbage, please don’t take it as gospel truth until you check with someone who actually knows what they are talking about.
Do I know what I’m talking about, well, only you can judge that one. But everything I do tell you can be justified with full resolution images – not meaningless little jpegs on a web site.
Anyway, that’s it – rant over!
As ever, if you like the info in this post hit the subscribe button. Hop over to my YouTube channel and subscribe there too and if you are feeling generous then a couple of bucks donation via PayPal to firstname.lastname@example.org would be gratefully appreciated!